Interest Representation in Europe – earlier Yearbook articles now available online

IEP Berlin

If you want to dive deep into the yearly state of European integration, there is no better source than the Jahrbuch der Europäischen Integration (Yearbook of European Integration) published by the Institut für Europäische Politik e.V.

In the upcoming 2024/25 edition (to be released this autumn), my new chapter will focus on EU interest representation. I cover developments from June 2024 to June 2025: the ongoing controversies around the Transparency Register, the rising relevance of strategic corruption, the reconfiguration of lobbying after the 2024 European elections, and looming cuts to EU funding for non-state organisations. My conclusion looks ahead to 2025/26 – from omnibus packages on cutting red tape to the “Readiness 2030” defence programme and the next Multiannual Financial Framework. A key question will remain how EU institutions can safeguard integrity and transparency under the pressure of geopolitical influence.

Good news: my earlier yearbook contributions are now freely accessible in the online archive of the Institut für Europäische Politik (IEP). Anyone interested in tracing the evolution of #LobbyEU since 2012 can find them here:

👉 Jahrbuch-Archiv – Institut für Europäische Politik

Unfortunately, the most recent editions are still missing – publishers remain reluctant to embrace open-source publishing, even when it comes to tax-funded projects largely carried by volunteers. Still, the archive already offers a valuable opportunity to follow continuity and change in EU lobbying over more than a decade.

Autumn in the European Lobby

The Qatar Gate scandal now seems distant, and it is increasingly unlikely that Eva Kaili will face trial in Belgium for her alleged involvement in the corruption case. However, the integrity system within European lawmaking has developed. Although not far enough for many, it is moving in the right direction. In two handbook chapters on Lobbying in the European Union and in my recent yearbook article Interest Representation in the EU, I provided some overviews of the EU’s integrity framework.

Read more

Why Bluesky is the New Hope After the Fall of Twitter

How did Jerry Fish put it? “It takes balls to be a butterfly!” But Bluesky’s butterfly has made it. Over 10 million accounts is a clear statement against X. Moreover, Bluesky is a revival of the Twitter we once knew. The narcissistic Elon Musk, infatuated with Trump, had previously killed the Twitter bird with a simple X. But the butterfly of Bluesky won’t be easily stifled. It’s decentralized like Mastodon, but still professionally managed. This is encouraging.

Why Do I Miss Twitter?

Jon Worth once pointed it out to me: Twitter was an ideal platform for international networking without much fuss. Especially in my work related to European politics, Twitter was a central place for exchange. With over 7,000 followers, I may not have been at the top, but I still managed to reach beyond the usual bubbles in politics, academia, and journalism. I look back nostalgically at my Twitter history. During the financial crisis, there was no better platform for intelligent networking. The unnecessary Brexit, in particular, significantly invigorated the European political discourse. Berlin’s journalist bubbles were suddenly no longer important. You could communicate excellently between Brussels , the national capitals, but also with Maastricht, Florence, and Tartu. The contributions of Simon Hix and Ron Patz. who created the hashtag #EuCo for the European Council, were legendary.

What Set Twitter Apart from Other Social Media Platforms?

Twitter was the democratic among the channels. Networking and mutual optimization were more important than mere show-off, as we unfortunately see more and more in post-Bologna universities and PR schools. Posting, influencing, and engaging were also important on Twitter, but there was always a certain democratic collective intelligence. Bubbles on Twitter were more like a pluralistic foam bath. Twitter was a square, not a tower, as Niall Ferguson described it.

Then Came the Post-Fascist Musk…

An authoritarian narcissist killed Twitter. I am still on [X](https://x.com), but I am clearly preparing my eXodus. The first step is securing the good times of Twitter. Downloading all my tweets since October 2008 made me nostalgic but also determined to move on. But where to emigrate?

I first gave Mastodon a chance. Wonderfully decentralized, but somehow the mammoth didn’t move… I stayed afloat with LinkedIn, but it remained a Facebook for careerists…

The Second Chance I Gave to Bluesky

I only got the chance through a delayed invitation. I stayed offended and skeptical for a long time in the blue sky. But at least, there are very good guide for Bluesky.

But since this summer, I’ve been feeling the old Twitter vibe again. Initially, Bluesky was a purely green bubble with a few European academic sprinklings and Christian Democratic free spirits. The key to Bluesky’s success is Musk himself. His statements, such as claiming a “civil war is inevitable” after the racist attacks on open-minded England, have led to a massive exodus from X to Bluesky. Slowly, the EU bubble is awakening with #EUSky and #EurSky. As with Twitter, it is the Anglosaxons who are promoting the decentralized European discourse through social media.

The Game Changer for Me: Michiel van Hulten

Former MEP and head of Transparency International EU in Brussels, his Starter Packs EU Policy I and EU Policy Pack II, later MEPs and EU Bubble Journalist, were an excellent booster for my European job in the blue 🦋 sky. Just visit and follow everyone.

Why Bluesky Makes Sense

This became clear to me through the brilliant special edition of the podcast Quiet Riot on Bluesky with Rose – highly recommended.

At the EBD Network, we are currently preparing a campaign against X. The over 230 member organisations in the #EBDNetzwerk should soon no longer use X. But also the federal government and European institutions should no longer be impressed by Musk’s investments. X promotes fascist movements. The state and the EU should not be present on such platforms if they want to credibly oppose the fascist AfD.

#EuroComo future of Europe brain storming with Adenauer

Wanna get a forecast for the EU and Europe in 2030 and some insights of the strategic planning and soul of EPP, plus Think Tank expectations from more than 15 European Countries? Come to Cadenabbia! It was my 12th KAS Workshop on European Issues, vulgo #EuroComo, a great occassion for brainstorming and expert back ground talks in the first German Chancellor holiday Villa la Collina at Como Lake. As always, the event was a fantastic gathering of leaders, policymakers, and experts to discuss and strategize on the key challenges and opportunities facing the EU. As I am not party affiliated, representing the biggest German network on EU affairs in Germany, I am particulary grateful, to get Chatham House ensured insights about the European Peoples Party and its German member party CDU and KAS. Very democratic.

Read more